I have been involved in several cases dealing with the inheritance
rights of children born out of wedlock, specifically such children inheriting
from their father. These cases generally
only arise when the alleged father died without a will (known as “intestate”),
though it could possibly arise in some cases where there is a last will and
testament.
Virginia law has changed over the years regarding the inheritance
rights of illegitimate children (a term that I am not a fan of, and thankfully,
seems to be used less and less). Children
born out of wedlock can inherit from their mother. It used to be that children born out of
wedlock could not inherit from their father.
Since 1978, under Virginia Code Section 64.2-102, children
born out of wedlock can also inherit from their father, in one of two
circumstances: (1) the parents get married before or after the child is born,
but the marriage is deemed invalid under the law, or (2) paternity is proved by
clear and convincing evidence. Virginia Code
Section 64.1-103 lists various methods or proof that constitutes “clear and convincing
evidence”. They are:
1. That he cohabited openly with
the mother during all of the 10 months immediately prior to the time the child
was born;
2. That he gave consent to a physician or other person, not including the mother, charged with the responsibility of securing information for the preparation of a birth record that his name be used as the father of the child upon the birth record of the child;
3. That he allowed by a general course of conduct the common use of his surname by the child;
4. That he claimed the child as his child on any statement, tax return, or other document filed and signed by him with any local, state, or federal government or any agency thereof;
5. That he admitted before any court having jurisdiction to determine his paternity that he is the father of the child;
6. That he voluntarily admitted paternity in writing under oath;
7. The results of scientifically reliable genetic tests, including DNA tests, weighted with all the evidence; or
8. Other medical, scientific, or anthropological evidence relating to the alleged parentage of the child based on tests performed by experts.
2. That he gave consent to a physician or other person, not including the mother, charged with the responsibility of securing information for the preparation of a birth record that his name be used as the father of the child upon the birth record of the child;
3. That he allowed by a general course of conduct the common use of his surname by the child;
4. That he claimed the child as his child on any statement, tax return, or other document filed and signed by him with any local, state, or federal government or any agency thereof;
5. That he admitted before any court having jurisdiction to determine his paternity that he is the father of the child;
6. That he voluntarily admitted paternity in writing under oath;
7. The results of scientifically reliable genetic tests, including DNA tests, weighted with all the evidence; or
8. Other medical, scientific, or anthropological evidence relating to the alleged parentage of the child based on tests performed by experts.
In one case I handled, the father’s name was on the birth
certificate (number 2) and the father had admitted paternity in child support
case in another state (number 5).
In a more recent case, my client (the putative child)
reached an agreement with the siblings of the decedent (who would inherit if my
client were not the child of the decedent) that my client and a brother of the
decedent would submit to avuncular and Y-STR DNA testing and be bound by the
results. The siblings and other family
members denied that my client was the son, but the DNA testing proved
otherwise.
A couple of important things to note if a person believes they
are the natural child of someone who died:
First, the statue requires that within one year from the
decedent’s date of death (not the opening of probate) the child files an
affidavit with the court alleging that they are the natural child of the
decedent and a suit is filed to establish paternity. Failure to do so cuts off the right to inherit. (The requirement does not apply if (1) the father’s
name is on the birth certificate, (2) paternity has been admitted by the father
in court or in writing under oath or (3) a court has already declared paternity).
Second, if DNA testing is being considered, and the father
is deceased and interred, it appears that the child has the right to get a
court order to exhume the father for a DNA sample, if the child pays the costs
for doing so. A fairly recent Virginia
Supreme Court case said that a putative child could not be denied the right to
exhume as long as it is for the purpose of attempting to prove paternity.
There are additional factors and considerations when
considering an attempt to prove paternity for inheritance purposes, and this article
is not intended to be an exhaustive discussion.
Feel free to contact me with questions.